Knowledge
as Property: Who Owns What and Why
By Molefi Kete Asante
The general revolution
that brought into the world reality the capitalist mode of thinking
and the concomitant Western triumphalism created, inter alia,
a racialist location of almost every institution. Any quick reading
of the past five hundred years will demonstrate to the most uninformed
reader that the accumulation of wealth by the West and the concomitant
commodification of everything from sex to religion has left the
world spiritually poorer. Actually the West has also commodified
its own color so that whiteness is bought and sold as a property.
In Brazil, for a long time the soccer hero Pele was considered
white and in the previous regime of South Africa, a person of
Japanese background or a visiting African American serving the
United States government could also be white. The only reason
for this situation was the investing of whiteness with the inauthentic
significance of better than or superior to. Of course, this had
neither reality in history nor in fact, it was simply a fictionalized
version of self glorification.
However, by virtue
of operating on the basis of this fiction and the others that
accompanied it the White Western World created conditions for
controlling not only its own population but the wealth produced
in other lands. Native peoples of the Americas, Africa, and Asia
were often victims of the single-minded attempt of Europeans to
define a world in their own terms. Thus, Macaulay could write
in the l9th century that the British ambition in India was to
create a race of people who would British in taste, opinions,
desires, fashion, and only Indian in color.
The fact that 358
billionaires control 45 % of the world's wealth underlines another
aspect of these five hundred years and it is the concentration
of wealth in the hands of the few at the expense of the many.
Although Japan has assumed its role aside the Western powers in
regards to wealth and in some instances more aggressive than the
Western nations it has also fallen victim to the Western insistence
on knowledge, that is, knowledge gained and understood by the
West as power. Thus, Japanese millionaires regularly purchase
Western knowledge in all of its forms, art, gadgets, encyclopedias,
and first editions of European and American writers. These properties
become evidence, in the Japanese mind, of their attainment of
first orderness, a sort of racial categorization that places value
on the acquisition of Western things. Poorer Asian or African
nations with little surplus money are not inclined to spend their
surplus on purchasing Western knowledge in the form of first edition
books and European art, although they are often forced by virtue
of the construction of their economies to purchase Western technology,
textbooks, and consequently the creators and makers of those items,
consultants, further enriching the West.
But what of knowledge
and its commodification? "Knowledge as Property: Who Owns What
and Why?" seeks to ferret out the complex relationship between
knowledge, communication, ownership, and control. When the Europeans
first met Africans they often claimed to have signed contracts
that gave them African lands. With the Native Americans it was
similar. Europeans using their own cultural barometers and measures
often imposed by force their wills on the Native Americans, claiming
afterwards that the land was given to them by the Native Americans
or was traded for beads and trinkets. Once the land was in the
hands of the Europeans, there was a transformation in conception.
They began to colonize not just the geography but the information
about the land as well. Colonized information became property
to them. They owned it and could interpret it, also claiming the
right to exclusive interpretation.
A principal model
of domination in the Western world is through the accumulation
of private property. It rarely matters if the property accumulated
is considered a person or a book, the idea is to bring property
to the social and political core and to disseminate information
about it from the core. Europeans begin with the idea that only
information worthwhile to Europe is significant. A number of institutions
have been set up in the West to insure the domination of knowledge
not just of Europe and America but of other parts of the world
as well. This is why there are more significant historical monuments
of early Mesopotamia in Europe than there are in Iraq, or why
there are more pieces of African art in the French Museum of Man
than there are in Abidjan. Thus, the museum, like the library,
is a creation of accumulation of knowledge as if it is a commodity.
In Africa the idea
of the library or the museum was connected to the memory of the
ancestors, that is, to do what they wanted you to do, and to remember
them and their deeds by perfecting their works. The idea of the
museum was not separate from that of the library. In the West
the separation of the library from the museum meant that the commodification
of knowledge was going through the same process of specialization
that was affecting the rest of the West.
The nature of the
museum business is such that only a small cadre of white supremacists
can be said to operate the museusms in contemporary Western societies.
We know that they are White supremacists in a multiracial society
when we see that their exhibits, their spaces, their lectures,
their interests, and their promotions are essentially white racial
in character. If you walk into the Philadelphia Museum of Art
and see its permanent collection you would be seeing the same
names as those you would see in any other American and European
museum without reference to the dynamic character of this society
as a multi racial and multi cultural reality. The aim is to marginalize
African, Native American, and Asian people in the context of creative
production in the West.
In every sector
of the societies of the Western world and in some of the nonWestern
world's societies the control of knowledge and the creation of
fences to keep others from knowledge is the principal mechanism
of the Western world. If you take any one of the knowledge producing
institutions or the situations where knowledge is maintained you
will discover that the fundamental aims of the institutions is
to make information mysterious, to mystify the simple, to keep
children away from the advance levelsof information, and to distance
some groups of people from access to information. In reality,
the idea behind racial and gender discrimination is rooted in
the limitations of access to knowledge because knowledge has become
property reserved for a few. But this reservation of knowledge
is motivated by the quest for domination.
In the fields of
astronomy and geology, the special character of this process is
seen in the European penchant for naming natural phenomena, whether
constellations or rock formations, after white people. It is a
method of claiming the earth, much like Mercator claimed the globe
or Amerigo Vespucci was given America. At the root of the knowledge
as property crisis in the academy is the fact that whites have
claimed what is not theirs. In other words, they have grabbed
the space that has remained unoccupied as well as have changed
the names of spaces that have always been occupied or to put it
another way, space that was traditionally named by indigenous
people has been renamed and captured as contraband. Anything that
is owned by those who are African and Asian and American is up
for grabs in this imperial reach of the white world. This means
that information about Africa, if it is owned by Africans, is
also up for contest in the minds of whites who seek to become
the principal interpreters of other people's cultures.
The development
of disciplines such as anthropology, ethno musicology, and paleontology
were designed to produce knowledge that could be controlled and
maintained in the hand of the West. There was no moral character
to this development. The fact of the matter is that the character
was of acquisition of information. So distorted has the situation
become that the University of Syracuse is the center of information
about Uganda and Kenya. If you want to find original documents
about the Kenyan or Ugandan societies you are most likely to discover
this information in Syracuse and not in Kampala and Nairobi.
Methods of Claiming Knowledge as
Property
Many whites simply
declared that knowledge, particularly African knowledge, belonged
to the West, despite the fact that the knowledge was revealed
in places other than Europe. There was an arrogance here, it goes
without saying, as the European claimants on the knowledge industry
in Africa or South America or Asia gathered to themselves the
attributes of others. Thus Hegel could claim that Africa was outside
of history, that it was no part of human history, and in so claiming
make a statement within the context of Western society that dictated
a different orientation to the One can impose one's will on land
that is owned or claimed by others.
In some cases Africans
and Asians have granted Europeans knowledge about their societies.
Freely we have given and freely the Europeans have received. A
host of African guides, Indian guides, have led Europeans to natural
wonders and to historical locations only to have Europeans claim
that they are the discoverers of those places. Or in some cases
they have changed the names of the African places to European
ones. A case in point is how Musiwatunya became Victoria Falls.
There is the situation
with Cecil John Rhodes and Lobengula, the claim that Lobengula,
the Paramount King of the Ndebeles, gave Zimbabwe to Rhodes' delegation
by signing a contract, handing the land over to the whites. This
was a fabrication but it was good enough for Europeans to enter
with force into Zimbabwe.
Let me put forward
a general working hypothesis about the buying and selling process
of knowledge. The contemporary society, in Europe and America,
has yet to confront the fundamental issue of the payment for knowledge.
Yet all around us we see the fallout of this process. Take the
issue of the cost of the instruments of retrieving knowledge or
storing knowledge to be used later. For the majority of people
the cost of a computer is just now moving to an acceptable price
for the average family's budget. So if you did not have or do
not have now a computer you are outside of the loop of knowledge
that is produced in the world. Nor can you actually add your voice
to the mix that is defining the state of knowledge. I once visited
the presidential offices of an African president only to find
that his secretary was still using a typewriter and there was
not a computer to be seen. This is not simply a matter of being
unfamiliar but rather a matter of the cost of computerizing offices
and teaching all of the staff members the various applications
for the computers. Let me go further and say that the computer
is just one instrument that must be taken into consideration when
we examine the cost of knowledge.
The protocols of
knowledge acquisition involve financial cost often beyond the
scope of the masses of people to afford. A series of fees, reproduction
costs, licenses, access payments, and subscription prices for
journals or membership fees for book clubs or professional organizations
make it impossible for some people to have access to knowledge.
Even conferences have become expenses that most people cannot
afford and therefore they cannot get the most current information.
When a conference fee is $385.00 plus the cost of airline tickets
and hotel charges most individuals must leave the knowledge to
elites whose bourgeois class conditions give them greater access
to information.
What is predictable
is that the knowledge necessary to change the conditions of people's
lives is mystified by those who control it. This is particularly
true in the health area. There is absolutely no reason why it
should cost an American person $1000 per day to be in a hospital
except for the immoral construction of the capitalist greed.
Knowledge is a commodity
to sell and possess in the construction of the West. I own a certain
knowledge and can patented it for l9 years or copyright it for
75. New forms of ownership are being explored right now because
of the proliferation of computer software programs. But all of
this is rooted in the historical encounter with nature and with
other people.
Take the protection
of fire as an example. In prehistoric times the protection of
fire, particularly in Europe, because that is where it was essential
for heat in the winter, was tantamount to protection of civilization
or society. If you did not protect your fire, you could freeze
to death or die of hunger. So the protection of fire was a chief
responsibility of the keeper or chief or leader of the clan. Dogs
were trained to sit outside of the entrance to caves to protect
the fire burning inside from strangers, whose ambition was often
to steal fire. In this respect the protecting of and attempting
to steal fire worked together to create xenophobia, fear of strangers
and also the idea that the dog was European man's best friend.
This is myth upon which the protection of knowledge is based.
It is a myth based on ignorance and fear that if others possess
certain knowledge they would endanger the right of whites. But
if we are sharing and there is trust then there is no need for
fear and distrust. It is only when you will use your knowledge
of fire to raid my village and to set my houses and fields afire
that we must be enemies.
Knowledge, like
fire, is the literal and concrete result of creative production.
Thus, knowledge , not the creative process, is locked behind the
door of no-admittance. Knowledge becomes the accumulation of the
products of creation, the actual information in a packaged and
useful form. So in order to keep knowledge away from others it
is necessary to build structures that contain these forms, these
packages, and then to put people in charge of protecting access.
In fact, one might even conceal the presence of the knowledge,
claiming it does not exist when it does, or saying that you do
not have it when you actually have it and are using it. These
are feats of great magic, sort of now you see it and now you don't
kind of operations. It is the logic of the West in regards to
almost all kinds of knowledge that affects or could affect the
African nations.
The knowledge to
do away with poverty over much of the world exists. This is no
miracle. This is no great revelation. What does not exist is the
will to see to it that those who benefit by impoverishing others
will cease to benefit. We know, for example, that you can produce
enough medicines to wipe out certain diseases in the African and
Asian continents that no longer kill children in the Americas,
but doing it takes a lot of stamina and will on the part of the
creative and progressive elements of society. We can educate our
children. The knowledge is available. We can eradicate illiteracy.
This is no great task if it was financially feasible to someone.
Actually the more
important the knowledge is to our health, well-being, and stability,
the greater the cost. The less helpful it is to us, the easier
it is to buy. Put it this way, if it will help you, it is expensive;
if it will kill you, it is inexpensive. This is why it is easier
to buy a gun than to purchase prozac in America. This is why securing
medical assistance will cost you enormous sums but harming people,
hurting them, preventing them from expanding their knowledge base
is cheap.
We are tied to a
system of injustice that makes it possible for rich nations to
make knowledge or the access to knowledge difficult for poorer
nations. This is one way to keep them poor. It is like it was
in the South in this country in the l950s when I was in elementary
school. We used the second handed books from the white schools.
And the white schools of Georgia were as racist and white supremacist
as they wanted to be. But we were forced by the public system
of education to use the books they used. Could we be much more
than black copies of the white copies? No, we were stuck in a
particular place and space and it was important that we understood
our own ability to resist, but our resistance was not what we
wanted it to be, because we did not know all that we needed to
know.
John Locke, one
of the great godfathers of the West, had said that all people
were entitled to property by nature. But he believed that a person's
work made the property his. For Locke, it was a question of work
and investment. Nature intended for every person to invest but
some will not work to invest. Nature intended everyone to be taken
care of but with money some can buy more than their enttitlements.
In much the same way, one sixth of the world population is now
using more than 50% of the world's resources. But the real deal
is that if it were any different, that is, in a positive sense
where all shared in the world's resources like the United States,
the world would be a worst place pollution wise, education wise,
and morally. There is a bankrupt policy about knowledge that parades
as if it is substantive and genuine.
Those who own knowledge
do so not because they are smarter or more ambitious, but because
they are more aggressive and capable of employing more force.
Much of the knowledge, as I have said, is not their own knowledge,
it is borrowed, rented, stolen, but they have created the mechanisms
of access. Thus, you must find the ways to access it for your
own use if you are in the game, otherwise you remain outside of
the arena of knowledge that affects the world. Right now, African
nations and African peoples, are on the verge of being shut off
from the storehouses of knowledge. This will happen more and more
with the development of more computer technology. We will be able
to see the INTERNET, superhighway, but we will not be able to
ride it
Sometimes even we
African Americans believe in Western cultural power so strongly
that our own knowledge becomes only a part of the European's captured
knowledge, often captured from ourselvees. Take the fact that
Herodotus claimed that the African originals of the Greek deities
were even unknown to most Greeks. In fact, medicine, the calendar,
mathematics, literature, writing, and architecture had their origins
in Africa but as we know today very few people in the West would
give Africans the credit for establishing the foundations of Western
knowledge even centuries after the Greeks. Imhotep, the father
of architecture, was an African. He built the first masonry structure
in history. Hatshepsut was the first queen to rule in her own
right with authority in the world. Various other kinds of information,
becoming knowledge, has been laid out in the works of Latouche,
Esteva, and Alvares, and Obenga.
Our aim as intellectual
activists must be to reduce the complications of access, to take
away exclusive rights to information, and to open the inner sanctuaries
to everyone. I hope that we understand that this is a challenge
to the racist ideology that permeates our society. White racial
supremacy has been the handmaiden of most of the wretchedness
confronting African and American peoples. If we are to be serious
about the process of decolonizing our minds we must pay attention
to the very human and spiritual needs of our world.